Next are my comments and direct responses below the second tweets of the two tweets conversation starting with access to The Economist’s article.
Why the risk of a no-deal Brexit is increasing
EUROPEAN UNION leaders had once hoped that a provisional Brexit deal would be struck at their October summit, which…
José Antonio Vanderhorst SilverioOct 17th, 22:07
My title on this comment is “What opportunity has a VISION that dissolves Brexit.” That title is in contrast to “Why the risk of a no-deal Brexit is increasing,” which has a beautiful subtitle: “The Brexit summit that begins in Brussels on October 17th is not going to solve the most pressing problem.” Both titles are framed by what Roberto Verganti calls “Innovation of Meanings” and “Innovation of solutions,” respectively, in his book “Overcrowded: Designing Meaningful Products in a World Awash with Ideas.”
When Margaret Thatcher’s TINA — There Is No Alternative — narrative to Neoliberalism had not available an “Innovation of Meaning,” she overextended the useful life of The Wealth of Nations mindset since then. Thatcher’s PLAN have resulted in unintended consequences, like Climate Change, huge Immigration, unacceptable inequality that later on migrated into developed countries, and last but not least populism, just to name a few.
The Washington Consensus that mutually reinforce TINA was changed in 2009 into what I coined as the Dark Globalization. “Today’s G20 deal will solve financial crisis, claims Gordon Brown,” who added “… the ability of the G20 countries to work together in this way showed that the era when global finance was dominated by the so-called “Washington consensus” was over… “I think a new world order is emerging with the foundation of a new progressive era of international cooperation.”
As can be seen, for example, in my 12 and 10 comments under The Economist’s articles “The quest to remake British politics,” and “The next recession,” respectably I have developed a personal VISION corresponding to an “Innovation of Meaning.” In the post “#GreatNews4GD: Theresa May (@theresa_may) no es la única despistada con el #Brexit ( https://medium.com/@gmh_upsa/greatnews4gd-theresa-may-theresa-may-no-es-... ),” something like “#GreatNews4GD: Theresa May (@theresa_may) is not the only one clueless with #Brexit,” all of the leaders involved, not only in the UK, but also in the European Union, that are behind an “Innovation of solutions,” are clueless.
Unlike most people, I am able to say clueless, because in September 2014 I wrote the post “Why the Eurozone leaders must change their common sense first (https://grupomillenium.blogspot.com/2014/09/why-eurozone-leaders-must-ch... ).” That was before Brexit, with the introduction:
“…the central problem of economics is not equilibrium but structural change. This then led to Schumpeter’s famous theorem of the innovator as the true subject of economics.”
“Economics, for Keynes, was the equilibrium economics of Ricardo’s 1810 theories, which dominated the 19th century. This economics deals with a closed system and a static one. Keynes’ key question was the same question the 19th-century economists had asked: ‘How can one maintain an economy in balance and stasis?’”
“…it is becoming increasingly clear that it is Schumpeter who will shape the thinking and inform the questions on economic theory and economic policy for the rest of this century, if not for the next 30 or 50 years.’’
Peter F. Drucker, “Schumpeter And Keynes,” May 1983.
Kremilek2Oct 17th, 16:26
Now we see how slowly the idea of the second referendum is approaching its realization. It is the only sensible solution of the problem. I don’t think that majority of Britons understood what hard border in Ireland would mean when voting in the first referendum.
There is a democratic future opportunity in the world as soon as there is democratic future in Europe. As there is a BREAKTHROUGH in my first comment for a 28 members wide European referendum (mentioned in a few of my 22 earlier comments) to make the European Union democratic, neither Brexit, nor Bremain, are needed by the people.
The EU is nothing more than a modern day “Tower of Babel” except God doesn’t have to get involved.
Thank you very much for responding. That “Tower of Babel” might be true for some, but now, for example, it is quite evident that Brexit is not based on the will of the British people and is of course neither democratic.
The EU limits the voice of the people because it is afraid what could come up. The simpliest would be to take American model of the government and apply it. But this would exclude deep vested interests.
Thank you for your timely response. As you will see in the quality collaboration “Changing the Theory of Elections starting in the #USA and the #EU ( https://medium.com/@gmh_upsa/changing-the-theory-of-elections-starting-i... )” the American model with the obsolete mindset of The Wealth of Nations also limits the voice of the people.
Apart from gerrymandering tell us how the American model limits the voice of the people?
Thank for your quantity collaboration limited to the second degree of clarity. The obsolete Old Power mindset of The Wealth of Nations described, for example, in the quality collaboration “Changing the Theory of Elections starting in the #USA and the #EU ( https://medium.com/@gmh_upsa/changing-the-theory-of-elections-starting-i... )” have voters limited to choose the Dark Globalization (the reason Hillary lost) and DeGlobalization (the reason of the Brexit, USA, Italy votes), when they should be given the opportunity of the New Power mindset of The Wealth of Globalization that approximates the third degree of clarity to enables to vote on the Bright Globalization that make a Big Shift in direction by changing the Theory of Election.
Is this a spam?
I don´t think so. My last tweet responds to the tweet: the3million @The3Million 8h8 hours ago More Together with @BritishInEurope, @InLimboBrexit, @FinalSayForAll we are marching at the #PeoplesVoteMarch. #The5Million EU27 citizens in UK & UK citizens in EU27 are the people too & we demand to #GiveUsAVote. Meeting at Speaker’s Corner opposite Marble Arch at 11am. Join us!
— — — — — -
With Jose A Vanderhorst S @gmh_upsa More Replying to @The3Million @BritishInEurope and 2 others
#The5Million need an #EU wide #EU28 #GiveUsAVote referendum on the #BrightGlobalization VISION of #TheWealthOfGlobalization NOT a 2nd referendum to vote #Bremain #DarkGlobalization or #Brexit #DeGlobalization. Please consider my comments to @TheEconomist…